View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0005465 | 10000-006: Mappings | Spec | public | 2020-02-17 14:11 | 2020-06-18 17:43 |
| Reporter | Paul Hunkar | Assigned To | Randy Armstrong | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | reopened | ||
| Summary | 0005465: Security check description is incorrect | ||||
| Description | In part 6 the following txt exists: "If the Message is secured with asymmetric algorithms, then the receiver shall verify that it supports the requested SecurityPolicy. If the Message is the response sent to the Client, then the SecurityPolicy shall be the same as the one specified in the request. In the Server, the SecurityPolicy shall be the same as the one used to originally create the SecureChannel. The receiver shall check that the Certificate is trusted first and return Bad_CertificateUntrusted on error. The receiver shall then verify the SenderCertificate using the rules defined in Part 4. The receiver shall report the appropriate error if Certificate validation fails. The receiver shall verify the ReceiverCertificateThumbprint and report a Bad_CertificateUnknown error if it does not recognize it" the sentence "The receiver shall check that the Certificate is trusted first and return Bad_CertificateUntrusted on error" need to be removed since it should be Bad_securityChecksFailed | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | |||||
| Fix Due Date | |||||
| related to | 0004574 | closed | Randy Armstrong | Undefined status code Bad_CertificateUnknown used in Part 6 |
|
|
Also this txt Again wrong return code - all should just be specified in Part 4 like the text in the middle says |
|
|
Codes removed as requested. |
|
|
The verification of ReceiverCertificateThumbprint must be defined in Part 6. The ReceiverCertificateThumbprint is not defined in Part 4. The status code was changed to Bad_CertificateInvalid based on mantis 0004574 The following sentence needs to stay in Part 6: |
|
|
Fixed as requested, |
|
|
Agreed to change in virtual F2F. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-17 14:11 | Paul Hunkar | New Issue | |
| 2020-02-17 14:13 | Paul Hunkar | Note Added: 0011618 | |
| 2020-03-24 02:55 | Randy Armstrong | Assigned To | => Randy Armstrong |
| 2020-03-24 02:55 | Randy Armstrong | Status | new => resolved |
| 2020-03-24 02:55 | Randy Armstrong | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2020-03-24 02:55 | Randy Armstrong | Note Added: 0011826 | |
| 2020-04-21 17:03 | Matthias Damm | Status | resolved => feedback |
| 2020-04-21 17:03 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | fixed => reopened |
| 2020-04-21 17:03 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0011968 | |
| 2020-04-21 17:04 | Matthias Damm | Relationship added | related to 0004574 |
| 2020-06-02 15:58 | Jim Luth | Status | feedback => assigned |
| 2020-06-17 02:50 | Randy Armstrong | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2020-06-17 02:50 | Randy Armstrong | Note Added: 0012362 | |
| 2020-06-18 17:43 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2020-06-18 17:43 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.05 |
| 2020-06-18 17:43 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0012439 |