View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0008265 | 10000-004: Services | Spec | public | 2022-08-26 19:28 | 2022-09-30 13:41 |
| Reporter | Jim Luth | Assigned To | Randy Armstrong | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 1.04 | ||||
| Summary | 0008265: Missing requirement to validate Certificate Revocation List (CRL) | ||||
| Description | Clause 6.1.3 is missing the requirement for actors to verify that a CRL is valid before using it (i.e. it is signed by the appropriate CA, not tampered with, not expired ...) | ||||
| Additional Information | This issue was originally reported against Part 83 which has text copied from Part 4 -- see related issue. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | |||||
| Fix Due Date | |||||
| related to | 0008266 | acknowledged | Emanuel Kolb | Part 83: UAFX Offline Engineering | Missing requirement to validate Certificate Revocation List (CRL) |
| related to | 0008250 | closed | Todd Snide | Part 83: UAFX Offline Engineering | Part 83 section 7.7.2 Table 3 Find Revocation List description needs to be improved (D. Ziegler) |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 19:28 | Jim Luth | New Issue | |
| 2022-08-26 19:29 | Jim Luth | Issue cloned: 0008266 | |
| 2022-08-26 19:29 | Jim Luth | Relationship added | related to 0008266 |
| 2022-08-30 16:57 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Randy Armstrong |
| 2022-08-30 16:57 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2022-08-30 16:57 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0017471 | |
| 2022-09-30 13:41 | Jim Luth | Relationship added | related to 0008250 |
