0008964: More explicit language needed to describe the required/optional nature of AccumulatedLatency

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0008964	10000-022: Base Network Model	Spec	public	2023-05-16 14:18	2024-01-25 15:40

Reporter	Greg Majcher	Assigned To	Greg Majcher
Priority	normal	Severity	minor	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	acknowledged	Resolution	open

Summary	0008964: More explicit language needed to describe the required/optional nature of AccumulatedLatency
Description	Matthias Damm questioned whether "AccumulatedLatency (from IIeeeBaseTsnStreamType) was optional because it is only used on Listener side"? It is optional, because pure bandwidth reservations would not need the latency. For latency sensitive streams this is required on talker and listener side. Proposal: provide more details on that, once we introduce bandwidth and latency requirements to Part 14.
Tags	No tags attached.

Commit Version
Fix Due Date

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2023-05-16 14:18	Greg Majcher	New Issue
2023-06-06 15:27	Jim Luth	Assigned To	=> Greg Majcher
2023-06-06 15:27	Jim Luth	Status	new => assigned
2024-01-25 15:40	Greg Majcher	Status	assigned => acknowledged