View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0008968 | 10000-004: Services | Spec | public | 2023-05-17 15:18 | 2023-06-06 15:25 |
Reporter | Randy Armstrong | Assigned To | Randy Armstrong | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
Product Version | 1.04 | ||||
Summary | 0008968: Part 4 §6.1.3 should indicate that the error reported by the server to the client is Bad_SecurityChecksFailed for all steps | ||||
Description | Part 4 (v1.04) table 106 contains several items where it is not indicated that Server shall report Bad_SecurityChecksFailed to the Client instead of the detailed status. But it should be the cases due to additional information provided by Part 2 and Part 6. Indeed, in Part 2 §6.3 indicates: Thus no specific error code should be returned prior to secure channel establishment and then for the certificate validation steps during establishment. In addition, in Part 6 §6.7.6 it is indicated: This section only indicates reporting Bad_SecurityChecksFailed error code and that secured error responses can only be sent after establishment. In my opinion the Part 4 §6.1.3 should be modified to indicate that the server shall only report to client SecurityChecksFailed for every step it is missing. In addition, the following sentence might be modified to reflect that the server does not return the error status to the client but should log it: And we might want to add the sentence of Part 2 in an appropriate section of Part 4, may be the Secure Channel service section (§5.5.1) ? Moreover UACTT certificate validation tests should check for Bad_SecurityChecksFailed error, might display a warning if specific error code is reported to client and specific error codes might be checked manually in logs. Note: this subject was originally discussed in the OPC Foundation forum leading to the same conclusion on expected behavior of Server: | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | The text for Revocation Check needs to be removed from Part 4 | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
related to | 0008938 | closed | Paul Hunkar | 10000-002: Security | Part 4 §6.1.3 should indicate that the error reported by the server to the client is Bad_SecurityChecksFailed for all steps |
related to | 0008977 | closed | Alexander Allmendinger | CTT UA Scripts | Security certificate validation 038: expects Bad_SecurityChecksFailed whereas Bad_CertificateRevoked is actually expected |
|
This issue was created from 0008938 but it only concerns the following comment https://mantis.opcfoundation.org/view.php?id=8938#c19370
As discussed during the Security WG meeting the text mentioning Bad_SecurityChecksFailed needs to be removed from Revocation Check description. Another consequence is that UACTT security certificate validation test 038 expects Bad_SecurityChecksFailed whereas Bad_CertificateRevoked is actually expected. |
|
Security sub-group decided no change in Part 4 required. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-17 15:18 | Randy Armstrong | New Issue | |
2023-05-17 15:18 | Randy Armstrong | Status | new => assigned |
2023-05-17 15:18 | Randy Armstrong | Assigned To | => Randy Armstrong |
2023-05-17 15:18 | Randy Armstrong | Issue generated from: 0008938 | |
2023-05-17 15:18 | Randy Armstrong | Status | assigned => new |
2023-05-17 15:18 | Randy Armstrong | Project | 10000-002: Security => 10000-004: Services |
2023-05-22 10:05 | V. Monfort | Note Added: 0019425 | |
2023-05-26 14:54 | Paul Hunkar | Relationship added | related to 0008977 |
2023-06-06 15:24 | Jim Luth | Relationship added | related to 0008938 |
2023-06-06 15:25 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0019470 | |
2023-06-06 15:25 | Jim Luth | Status | new => closed |
2023-06-06 15:25 | Jim Luth | Resolution | open => no change required |