View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0010385Part 84: UAFX ProfilesSpecpublic2025-07-16 14:02
ReporterJan Murzyn Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status newResolutionopen 
Target VersionNextMaintenance 
Summary0010385: Restructure Conformance Units around PriorityMappingTable Methods.
Description

During F2F in Esslingen it was agreed that until the behaviour of the methods is clarified and prototyped, the methods should not be mandatory for UAFX Controllers. Without the methods, the table can be still configured by vendor specific means.

It was proposed to split the conformance unit to two, one for each method. It will allow for situation, that a new method is added in future e.g. a method to modify an existing table entry. The new ConformanceUnits should not be listed as mandatory for now.

TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

related to 0010383 new Part 82: UAFX Networking [sg.Networking] Don't mandate existence of the PriorityMappingTable methods by specification. 
related to 0010384 assignedThomas Enzinger 10000-022: Base Network Model Clarify behaviour of PriorityMappingTable Methods. 

Activities

Jan Murzyn

2025-06-25 08:02

developer   ~0023029

This issue is related to 10383 and 10384

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2025-06-25 08:00 Jan Murzyn New Issue
2025-06-25 08:02 Jan Murzyn Note Added: 0023029
2025-07-16 12:10 Bob Lattimer Relationship added related to 0010383
2025-07-16 12:10 Bob Lattimer Relationship added related to 0010384
2025-07-16 14:02 Paul Hunkar Target Version => NextMaintenance