View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010385 | Part 84: UAFX Profiles | Spec | public | 2025-06-25 08:00 | 2025-07-16 14:02 |
| Reporter | Jan Murzyn | Assigned To | |||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | new | Resolution | open | ||
| Target Version | NextMaintenance | ||||
| Summary | 0010385: Restructure Conformance Units around PriorityMappingTable Methods. | ||||
| Description | During F2F in Esslingen it was agreed that until the behaviour of the methods is clarified and prototyped, the methods should not be mandatory for UAFX Controllers. Without the methods, the table can be still configured by vendor specific means. It was proposed to split the conformance unit to two, one for each method. It will allow for situation, that a new method is added in future e.g. a method to modify an existing table entry. The new ConformanceUnits should not be listed as mandatory for now. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| related to | 0010383 | new | Part 82: UAFX Networking [sg.Networking] | Don't mandate existence of the PriorityMappingTable methods by specification. | |
| related to | 0010384 | assigned | Thomas Enzinger | 10000-022: Base Network Model | Clarify behaviour of PriorityMappingTable Methods. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-25 08:00 | Jan Murzyn | New Issue | |
| 2025-06-25 08:02 | Jan Murzyn | Note Added: 0023029 | |
| 2025-07-16 12:10 | Bob Lattimer | Relationship added | related to 0010383 |
| 2025-07-16 12:10 | Bob Lattimer | Relationship added | related to 0010384 |
| 2025-07-16 14:02 | Paul Hunkar | Target Version | => NextMaintenance |