View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010562 | 10000-006: Mappings | Spec | public | 2025-10-20 09:08 | 2025-10-22 12:11 |
| Reporter | Matthias Isele | Assigned To | Randy Armstrong | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Product Version | 1.05.06 RC1 | ||||
| Summary | 0010562: ApplicationInstanceCertificate - Subject Alternative Name | ||||
| Description | Following RFC 5280 and part 6 "Application Instance Certificate" it is technically allowed to have multiple occurences of uri in the subject alternative name. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | 1.05.07 RC1 | ||||
| Fix Due Date | 2025-11-15 | ||||
|
|
Agreed to clarify Part 6 that multiple URIs are allowed and Applications should not assume only one. Also clarify that more than one IP address is allowed (current spec only allows one). |
|
|
So far, I have input from seven independent OPC UA libraries including the OPCF .NET sample code. It is obvious that nobody ever used more than one URI in OPC UA application instance certificates. Allowing more URIs would create major interop issues |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-20 09:08 | Matthias Isele | New Issue | |
| 2025-10-21 16:10 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0023479 | |
| 2025-10-21 16:14 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Randy Armstrong |
| 2025-10-21 16:14 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2025-10-21 16:17 | Jim Luth | Commit Version | => 1.05.07 RC1 |
| 2025-10-21 16:17 | Jim Luth | Fix Due Date | => 2025-11-15 |
| 2025-10-22 12:11 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0023481 |