View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010126 | 10000-004: Services | Spec | public | 2025-01-30 14:04 | 2025-05-06 16:08 |
| Reporter | Matthias Isele | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 1.05.04 | ||||
| Fixed in Version | 1.05.06 RC1 | ||||
| Summary | 0010126: Behaviour of expired UserTokens not consistent | ||||
| Description | Description: Part 6 - 6.5.3.2 Access Tokens states: Part 4 - 7.41.5 X509IdentityTokens does not state anything about exipred tokens. My expectation is that the behaviour for an expired X509IdentityToken and an expired IssuedIdentityToken should be the same. Proposal:
| ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | 1.05.06 RC1 | ||||
| Fix Due Date | 2025-04-30 | ||||
|
|
try to apply the proposed changes; |
|
|
Added to 7.41.6 IssuedIdentityToken: Added to 7.41.5 X509IdentityTokens: |
|
|
Agreed to changes edited in web meeting. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-30 14:04 | Matthias Isele | New Issue | |
| 2025-02-25 17:38 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Matthias Damm |
| 2025-02-25 17:38 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2025-02-25 17:39 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0022409 | |
| 2025-02-25 17:39 | Jim Luth | Commit Version | => 1.05.06 RC1 |
| 2025-02-25 17:39 | Jim Luth | Fix Due Date | => 2025-04-30 |
| 2025-03-10 16:44 | Matthias Damm | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2025-03-10 16:44 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2025-03-10 16:44 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0022493 | |
| 2025-05-06 16:07 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2025-05-06 16:07 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.05.05 RC1 |
| 2025-05-06 16:07 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0022707 | |
| 2025-05-06 16:08 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | 1.05.05 RC1 => 1.05.06 RC1 |