View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010213 | 10000-003: Address Space | Spec | public | 2025-03-10 11:46 | 2025-04-29 15:49 |
| Reporter | Károly Szabó | Assigned To | Jeff Harding | ||
| Priority | low | Severity | text | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Product Version | 1.05.05 RC1 | ||||
| Fixed in Version | 1.05.06 | ||||
| Summary | 0010213: Minor issues in Part 3 Address Space Model | ||||
| Description | I think the following change between 1.04 and 1.05 is a bit misleading: If I interpret the definition of Simple and Built-in DataTypes correctly, than I think the Decimal does not fit in any of those categories. While reading the new specs I also found some minor formatting issues:
| ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | 1.05.05 | ||||
| Fix Due Date | 2025-04-15 | ||||
|
|
Change: "This Simple DataType defines a high-precision signed number." to: "This Simple DataType, but treated as a Built-in type, defines a high-precision signed number." |
|
|
Added clarification |
|
|
Agreed to changes in Web meeting. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-10 11:46 | Károly Szabó | New Issue | |
| 2025-04-01 15:52 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0022587 | |
| 2025-04-01 15:54 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Jeff Harding |
| 2025-04-01 15:54 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2025-04-01 15:54 | Jim Luth | Commit Version | => 1.05.05 |
| 2025-04-01 15:54 | Jim Luth | Fix Due Date | => 2025-04-15 |
| 2025-04-03 19:01 | Jeff Harding | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2025-04-03 19:01 | Jeff Harding | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2025-04-03 19:01 | Jeff Harding | Fixed in Version | => 1.05.06 |
| 2025-04-03 19:01 | Jeff Harding | Note Added: 0022591 | |
| 2025-04-29 15:49 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2025-04-29 15:49 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0022687 |
