View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0010252 | Part 84: UAFX Profiles | Spec | public | 2025-03-24 14:16 | 2025-03-24 15:50 |
| Reporter | Jim Luth | Assigned To | Jim Luth | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 1.00.00 Release | ||||
| Summary | 0010252: Remove Conformance Unit "UAFX FxAsset Type" | ||||
| Description | Part 81 explicitly states that "Conformance testing shall test that the required information, defined by the Interfaces included in the FxAssetType, is available, not that the Object is of FxAssetType. ". Since there can be no conformance test created for the Conformance Unit "UAFX FxAsset Type", it needs to be removed from Part 84 and the Profile database. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
|
|
The type is defined in the specification, having a ConformanceUnit for is fine. It is optional in the Facet/ |
|
|
see note: |
|
|
Paul convinced me that the CU is necessary because all types defined in the spec need compliance tests to be sure the correct NodeId and BrowseName are used by implementers. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-24 14:16 | Jim Luth | New Issue | |
| 2025-03-24 14:39 | Paul Hunkar | Note Added: 0022557 | |
| 2025-03-24 14:42 | Paul Hunkar | Assigned To | => Jim Luth |
| 2025-03-24 14:42 | Paul Hunkar | Status | new => feedback |
| 2025-03-24 14:42 | Paul Hunkar | Note Added: 0022558 | |
| 2025-03-24 15:50 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0022559 | |
| 2025-03-24 15:50 | Jim Luth | Status | feedback => closed |
| 2025-03-24 15:50 | Jim Luth | Resolution | open => no change required |
