According the State-Machine definition: "The StateMachineType shall have GeneratesEvent References to the targets of a HasEffect Reference for each of its Transitions."

ISA95 defines for all state transitions a HasEffect ISA95JobOrderStatusEventType. The ISA95JobResponseProviderObjectType has a GeneratesEvent on ISA95JobOrderStatusEventType.
However, ISA95JobOrderReceiverObjectType is a child of FiniteStateMachineType and not ISA95JobResponseProviderObjectType. Only Machinery combines ISA95JobOrderReceiverObjectType and ISA95JobResponseProviderObjectType with JobManagementType. In principle, ISA95JobOrderReceiverObjectType and ISA95JobResponseProviderObjectType are two different/independent object types.

As we understand it, GeneratesEvent is defined incorrectly and should go to ISA95JobOrderReceiverObjectType and not to ISA95JobResponseProviderObjectType.

The conformance unit "ISA-95 Job Control Job Response Provider Job Order Status Events" would still be valid because the events are extended to a “new” source. Or you can define this so that ISA95JobOrderReceiverObjectType is the event source (state machine events are not mandatory).