View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0010388Part 81: UAFX Connecting Devices and Information Model [sg.BaseFacet]Specpublic2025-08-08 12:23
ReporterJan Murzyn Assigned ToJan Murzyn  
PrioritylowSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status assignedResolutionopen 
Target VersionNextMaintenance 
Summary0010388: Clarification needed for BestEffort vs. None/Untagged QoS capability.
Description

In terms of QoS the below 2 are different cases, which need to be expressed in capabilities:

  • Support untagged ethernet frames
  • Support priority based QoS with a label mapped to "Best Effort" according to Part 84 Table 1 (this results in tagged frame)
TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

related to 0010389 assignedMatthias Damm 10000-014: PubSub Differentiate best-effort from None/Untagged in QoS parameter. 
related to 0010390 new Part 82: UAFX Networking [sg.Networking] Clarify difference between untagged vs Best Effort (tagged with PCP 0, DSCP 0) QoS. 
has duplicate 0010247 closedPaul Hunkar Part 81: UAFX Connecting Devices and Information Model [sg.BaseFacet] Need clarifications around QoS capabilities 

Activities

Paul Hunkar

2025-08-08 12:21

manager   ~0023211

from 10247
This suggests that if one want to indicate best effort is supported, they should add an entry with NULL or empty category label. At the same time there seems to be implicit assumption that if the whole variable is set to null the best effort is the only supported QoS.

Some additional description and/or example would be nice.
Consider introducing the "best effort" label, instead of using null/empty as a magic number.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2025-06-25 09:06 Jan Murzyn New Issue
2025-06-25 09:06 Jan Murzyn Status new => assigned
2025-06-25 09:06 Jan Murzyn Assigned To => Jan Murzyn
2025-06-25 09:46 Jan Murzyn Relationship added related to 0010389
2025-06-25 09:46 Jan Murzyn Relationship added related to 0010390
2025-07-12 00:51 Paul Hunkar Target Version => NextMaintenance
2025-07-12 00:52 Paul Hunkar Relationship added related to 0010247
2025-08-08 12:21 Paul Hunkar Note Added: 0023211
2025-08-08 12:22 Paul Hunkar Relationship replaced has duplicate 0010247
2025-08-08 12:23 Paul Hunkar Priority normal => low