View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0001077 | 10000-004: Services | public | 2010-04-06 18:39 | 2012-02-09 22:44 | |
Reporter | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | |||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Fixed in Version | 1.02 | ||||
Summary | 0001077: EndpointDescription.SecurityLevel (Byte) description is vague | ||||
Description | The description of the SecurityLevel parameter in Table 124 (EndpointDescription) does not specify HOW the ranking system should occur. Currently, the only specification is that a value of zero is not recommended as it exists for backwards compatibility only. Guidance should be provided to state the order of the ranking, for example: What about recommendations on increments and limits? e.g. Or, should the server simply rank each endpoint as in: 5 endpoints returned to the Client with the lowest rank = 1 and the highest rank = 5. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
|
July 6th - Add text to description that says 'higher values indicate better security' |
|
Added clarification that a higher value indicates better security.l Change is part of the draft version "OPC UA Part 4 - Services Draft 1.02.02 Body.doc" |
|
Reviewed in Walldorf. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2010-04-06 18:39 |
|
New Issue | |
2010-07-06 17:31 | Randy Armstrong | Note Added: 0001908 | |
2010-07-06 17:31 | Randy Armstrong | Status | new => assigned |
2010-07-06 17:31 | Randy Armstrong | Assigned To | => Matthias Damm |
2011-03-13 19:57 | Matthias Damm | Status | assigned => resolved |
2011-03-13 19:57 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
2011-03-13 19:57 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0002394 | |
2011-05-23 10:26 | Randy Armstrong | Status | resolved => closed |
2011-05-23 10:26 | Randy Armstrong | Note Added: 0002711 | |
2012-02-09 22:44 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.02 |