View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0002608 | 10000-004: Services | public | 2013-09-23 08:17 | 2013-10-10 15:11 | |
| Reporter | Matthias Damm | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Fixed in Version | 1.03 | ||||
| Summary | 0002608: Writing of IndexRange optional? | ||||
| Description | There are systems where it is not possible to write an IndexRange in a consistent way. The best example is an OPC UA server that is a wrapper for a COM DA Server. I thought we have a status code and description for this case to reject this write. But I did not find anything when searching OPC UA Part 4 during the IOP workshop last week in Nuremberg. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | |||||
| Fix Due Date | |||||
|
|
Added the following clarification to Table 55 – Write Service Parameters - parameter indexRange: Resolved in document IEC 62541-4 - Services [Pre-CDV] 1.02.03.doc |
|
|
Agreed to changes edited in the Dallas F2F. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-23 08:17 | Matthias Damm | New Issue | |
| 2013-09-24 17:14 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2013-09-24 17:14 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Matthias Damm |
| 2013-09-24 20:24 | Matthias Damm | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2013-09-24 20:24 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2013-09-24 20:24 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0004997 | |
| 2013-10-10 15:11 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2013-10-10 15:11 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0005050 | |
| 2013-10-10 15:11 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.03 |
