View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003614 | NodeSets, XSDs and Generated Code | Api Change | public | 2016-11-22 16:29 | 2022-12-08 15:55 |
| Reporter | Jim Luth | Assigned To | Archie Miller | ||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||
| Summary | 0003614: StandardDeviation and Variance aggregate examples for Historian1 using an uncertain value when it should not | ||||
| Description | The 1.03 spec for the StandardDeviation and Variance aggregates says that only good values should be used. 5.4.3.37 says, "where X is each Good raw value in the interval, Avg(X) is the average of the Good raw values, and n is the number of Good raw values in the interval." and later "If any non-Good values were ignored, the Aggregate quality is uncertain/subnormal." But the tables in A.35.2, A.36.2, A.37.2, and A.38.2 all have incorrect values for the interval starting at 12:01:00 for Historian1. The results for each of these intervals should be zero because there is only one Good value in the interval. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | |||||
| Fix Due Date | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | New Issue | |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Rod Stein |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Issue generated from: 0003301 | |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Relationship added | related to 0003301 |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Status | assigned => acknowledged |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Project | 10000-013: Aggregates => NodeSets, XSDs and Generated Code |
| 2016-11-22 16:29 | Jim Luth | Category | Spec => Api Change |
| 2021-03-02 19:34 | Randy Armstrong | Assigned To | Rod Stein => Archie Miller |
| 2022-12-08 15:55 | Jim Luth | Status | acknowledged => assigned |