View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0004542 | 10000-004: Services | Spec | public | 2018-12-18 18:06 | 2020-06-15 17:56 |
Reporter | Jeff Harding | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Summary | 0004542: Error handling of Method calls | ||||
Description | I am not really sure to which part this belongs to. Issue: What I did not found anywhere I looked was the handling of such methods in the service call. Do we need to return a Good StatusCode on the services and then a user-defined method StatusCode that could indicate that the method failed? Can I even access the out parameters when the method returns a BAD status code on the service and expect anything useful in them? From my point of view it is desirable to define in the base specs (therefore I had chosen Part 3) at least a pattern that should be used to return Method-specific status codes and what is the expected behavior for on the service level. For this case it would also be good if the out variable can be an “extendable enum”, meaning not a specific Enum DataType (which cannot be extended) but something having EnumStrings or EnumValues so that standard information models can define some base status but vendors can extend that. As I understood proving such a feature is already in discussion anyhow. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
related to | 0005550 | closed | Matthias Damm | 10000-004: Services | Method out parameter handling if Method result is bad |
related to | 0004156 | closed | Jeff Harding | 10000-003: Address Space | Error handling of Method calls |
|
There needs to be a clarification describing what is returned by a method call when Bad Result codes are returned. |
|
Added to Method Response statusCode outputArguments Added in OPC 10000-4 - UA Specification Part 4 - Services Draft 1.05.08.docx |
|
Agreed to changes in Virtual F2F. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-18 18:06 | Jeff Harding | New Issue | |
2018-12-18 18:06 | Jeff Harding | Status | new => assigned |
2018-12-18 18:06 | Jeff Harding | Assigned To | => Jeff Harding |
2018-12-18 18:06 | Jeff Harding | Issue generated from: 0004156 | |
2018-12-18 18:08 | Jeff Harding | Project | 10000-003: Address Space => 10000-004: Services |
2018-12-18 18:12 | Jeff Harding | Note Added: 0009731 | |
2018-12-18 18:12 | Jeff Harding | Assigned To | Jeff Harding => Matthias Damm |
2018-12-18 18:45 | Jeff Harding | Relationship added | related to 0004156 |
2020-06-14 11:51 | Matthias Damm | Relationship added | related to 0005623 |
2020-06-14 11:52 | Matthias Damm | Relationship deleted | related to 0005623 |
2020-06-14 11:52 | Matthias Damm | Relationship added | related to 0005550 |
2020-06-14 11:52 | Matthias Damm | Status | assigned => resolved |
2020-06-14 11:52 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
2020-06-14 11:52 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0012267 | |
2020-06-15 17:56 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2020-06-15 17:56 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.05 |
2020-06-15 17:56 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0012308 |