View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0004704 | 10000-004: Services | Spec | public | 2019-03-29 14:41 | 2023-03-21 19:57 |
Reporter | Paul Hunkar | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Summary | 0004704: Certificate validation Steps - revocation lists | ||||
Description | in Table 106 - Find revocation list row - does not provided for a Bad_SecurityChecksFailed return. While running the new extended CTT certificate testing, we have had a vendor complain about the expect return code (see related mantis issue). for Revoked certificate Bad_SecurityChecksFailed is expected. An attacker could gain more information about a system, by blocking access to revocation lists if the more detailed error codes are returned. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
related to | 0004703 | resolved | Sebastian Allmendinger | CTT UA Scripts | inconsistency Security Certificate Validation/002.js vs. 042.js/043.js |
related to | 0002822 | closed | Matthias Damm | 10000-004: Services | A revoked certificate should be treated like an untrusted certificate |
|
in addition the last sentence in the first paragraph above the table indicates that if the application instance certificate is trusted then the certificate chains are not processed. This should be further explained [if a certificate is trusted i.e. in a trust list, but it is revoked by a CA what would happen - since the application instance certificate is explicitly trusted] |
|
This is related to 2822, because when the revocation list is unavailable but required for path validation |
|
Table 106 – Certificate validation steps |
|
Agreed to changes made in Dallas meeting. |
|
This issue should have an errata back to 1.04 or even 1.03 (raised from CMP group) |
|
Added errata for 1.04 and 1.03 |
|
Agreed to 1.03 and 1.04 Errata in Dallas meeting. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-29 14:41 | Paul Hunkar | New Issue | |
2019-03-29 14:43 | Paul Hunkar | Relationship added | related to 0004703 |
2019-03-29 15:12 | Paul Hunkar | Note Added: 0010079 | |
2019-04-02 15:26 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Matthias Damm |
2019-04-02 15:26 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
2019-04-06 11:31 | Bernd Edlinger | Relationship added | related to 0002822 |
2019-04-06 11:50 | Bernd Edlinger | Note Added: 0010142 | |
2020-03-04 22:01 | Matthias Damm | Status | assigned => resolved |
2020-03-04 22:01 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
2020-03-04 22:01 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0011669 | |
2020-03-04 22:01 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2020-03-04 22:01 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.05 |
2020-03-04 22:01 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0011670 | |
2022-11-02 17:11 | Paul Hunkar | Status | closed => feedback |
2022-11-02 17:11 | Paul Hunkar | Resolution | fixed => reopened |
2022-11-02 17:11 | Paul Hunkar | Note Added: 0018091 | |
2023-03-20 05:00 | Matthias Damm | Status | feedback => resolved |
2023-03-20 05:00 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | reopened => fixed |
2023-03-20 05:00 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0018903 | |
2023-03-21 19:57 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2023-03-21 19:57 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0018946 |