View Issue Details

Jump to NotesJump to History
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
000580610000-005: Information ModelSpecpublic2020-07-20 17:382021-06-07 06:59
ReporterJim Luth Assigned ToJeff Harding  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityhave not tried
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Summary0005806: Missing relation of types to conformance units and profiles
Description

At the moment it is not possible to identify the relation of a type or of instances to a conformance unit and to profiles. This is a growing problem since the OPC UA namespace is constantly extended and there is no way for tooling to reduce the exposed types if only a subset of the OPC UA features is implemented.

OPC UA Part 6 defines a Category field for a Node in the UANodeset. The Category takes a String [ ]. There is currently no information defined that goes into this category. It can be used to provide a list of conformance units.

Each type table needs to add the conformance unit(s) it is related to to allow tooling to select the necessary types based on the profile selection.

The conformance unit goes into the Category of the UANodeset for processing in tooling.

Additional Information

As agreed in the OPC UA meeting on July 14, 2020, each type table must be extended with a list of conformance units that require the type.

Add rows with one column to the end of the table.
The first row contains the heading "Conformance Units" in bold.
The second and following rows contain the name of the conformance units the type is required for.
This is typically one conformance unit.

Example can be found in the following document:
OPC 10000-8 - UA Specification Part 8 - DataAccess Draft 1.05.06.ExtensionCategory2.docx
posted in:
https://opcfoundation.sharepoint.com/UA/Work/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FUA%2Fwork%2FMeetings%2F2020%2F2020%2D07%2D14%20Weekly%20Telecon&FolderCTID=0x012000FDF01D76A1A64246B261F99AF1ACA00A&View=%7B10076F95%2D9CBF%2D4395%2D8545%2D378F95701D6A%7D

TagsNo tags attached.
Commit Version
Fix Due Date

Relationships

related to 0005731 closedMatthias Damm 10000-014: PubSub Missing relation of types to conformance units and profiles 
related to 0006990 closedKarl Deiretsbacher 10000-007: Profiles New CUs used for Node Tables 

Activities

Jeff Harding

2021-03-23 16:31

developer   ~0014055

Conformance Units rows in definition tables should have a double line separating the subheading and the units.

Jeff Harding

2021-04-22 20:20

developer   ~0014243

Conformance Units completed and table formatting completed

Jim Luth

2021-04-27 16:00

administrator   ~0014262

Agreed to changes in telecon.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2020-07-20 17:38 Jim Luth New Issue
2020-07-20 17:38 Jim Luth Status new => assigned
2020-07-20 17:38 Jim Luth Assigned To => Matthias Damm
2020-07-20 17:38 Jim Luth Issue generated from: 0005731
2020-07-20 17:38 Jim Luth Relationship added related to 0005731
2020-07-20 17:39 Jim Luth Project 10000-014: PubSub => 10000-005: Information Model
2020-07-20 17:39 Jim Luth Assigned To Matthias Damm => Jeff Harding
2020-07-20 17:39 Jim Luth Target Version => 1.05
2021-03-23 16:31 Jeff Harding Note Added: 0014055
2021-04-22 20:20 Jeff Harding Status assigned => resolved
2021-04-22 20:20 Jeff Harding Resolution open => fixed
2021-04-22 20:20 Jeff Harding Fixed in Version => 1.05
2021-04-22 20:20 Jeff Harding Note Added: 0014243
2021-04-27 16:00 Jim Luth Status resolved => closed
2021-04-27 16:00 Jim Luth Note Added: 0014262
2021-06-07 06:59 Karl Deiretsbacher Relationship added related to 0006990