0005816: Missing relation of types to conformance units and profiles - MantisBT

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0005816	10000-018: Role-Based Security	Spec	public	2020-07-20 18:03	2021-03-04 20:00

Reporter	Jim Luth	Assigned To	Matthias Damm
Priority	normal	Severity	feature	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	closed	Resolution	reopened

Summary	0005816: Missing relation of types to conformance units and profiles
Description	At the moment it is not possible to identify the relation of a type or of instances to a conformance unit and to profiles. This is a growing problem since the OPC UA namespace is constantly extended and there is no way for tooling to reduce the exposed types if only a subset of the OPC UA features is implemented. OPC UA Part 6 defines a Category field for a Node in the UANodeset. The Category takes a String [ ]. There is currently no information defined that goes into this category. It can be used to provide a list of conformance units. Each type table needs to add the conformance unit(s) it is related to to allow tooling to select the necessary types based on the profile selection. The conformance unit goes into the Category of the UANodeset for processing in tooling.
Additional Information	As agreed in the OPC UA meeting on July 14, 2020, each type table must be extended with a list of conformance units that require the type. Add rows with one column to the end of the table. The first row contains the heading "Conformance Units" in bold. The second and following rows contain the name of the conformance units the type is required for. This is typically one conformance unit. Example can be found in the following document: OPC 10000-8 - UA Specification Part 8 - DataAccess Draft 1.05.06.ExtensionCategory2.docx posted in: https://opcfoundation.sharepoint.com/UA/Work/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FUA%2Fwork%2FMeetings%2F2020%2F2020%2D07%2D14%20Weekly%20Telecon&FolderCTID=0x012000FDF01D76A1A64246B261F99AF1ACA00A&View=%7B10076F95%2D9CBF%2D4395%2D8545%2D378F95701D6A%7D
Tags	No tags attached.

Commit Version
Fix Due Date

Matthias Damm 2020-09-18 12:00 developer ~0012937	Added conformance unit assignment to type tables OPC 10000-18 - UA Specification Part 18 - User Authentication 1.05.0 Draft4.docx

Jim Luth 2020-09-18 12:20 administrator ~0012939	Agreed to changes in Virtual F2F.

Matthias Damm 2020-12-08 18:39 developer ~0013406	We need to assign the optional conformance units for the instances of the pre-defined roles.

Matthias Damm 2021-03-02 19:37 developer ~0013918	Added Table 3 – RoleSet Additional Conformance Units

Jim Luth 2021-03-04 20:00 administrator ~0013980	Agreed to changes in Virtual F2F.

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2020-07-20 18:03	Jim Luth	New Issue
2020-07-20 18:03	Jim Luth	Status	new => assigned
2020-07-20 18:03	Jim Luth	Assigned To	=> Matthias Damm
2020-07-20 18:03	Jim Luth	Issue generated from: 0005731
2020-07-20 18:03	Jim Luth	Relationship added	related to 0005731
2020-07-20 18:04	Jim Luth	Project	10000-014: PubSub => 10000-018: Role-Based Security
2020-09-18 12:00	Matthias Damm	Status	assigned => resolved
2020-09-18 12:00	Matthias Damm	Resolution	open => fixed
2020-09-18 12:00	Matthias Damm	Note Added: 0012937
2020-09-18 12:20	Jim Luth	Status	resolved => closed
2020-09-18 12:20	Jim Luth	Fixed in Version	=> 1.05
2020-09-18 12:20	Jim Luth	Note Added: 0012939
2020-12-08 18:39	Matthias Damm	Status	closed => feedback
2020-12-08 18:39	Matthias Damm	Resolution	fixed => reopened
2020-12-08 18:39	Matthias Damm	Note Added: 0013406
2021-03-02 19:37	Matthias Damm	Status	feedback => resolved
2021-03-02 19:37	Matthias Damm	Note Added: 0013918
2021-03-04 20:00	Jim Luth	Status	resolved => closed
2021-03-04 20:00	Jim Luth	Note Added: 0013980