View Issue Details

Jump to NotesJump to History
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
000619610000-100: DevicesSpecpublic2020-10-30 09:302020-12-01 14:54
ReporterKarl Deiretsbacher Assigned ToKarl Deiretsbacher  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityhave not tried
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Product Version1.02 
Fixed in Version1.03 
Summary0006196: Missing relation of types to conformance units and profiles
Description

At the moment it is not possible to identify the relation of a type or of instances to a conformance unit and to profiles. This is a growing problem since the OPC UA namespace is constantly extended and there is no way for tooling to reduce the exposed types if only a subset of the OPC UA features is implemented.

OPC UA Part 6 defines a Category field for a Node in the UANodeset. The Category takes a String [ ]. There is currently no information defined that goes into this category. It can be used to provide a list of conformance units.

Each type table needs to add the conformance unit(s) it is related to to allow tooling to select the necessary types based on the profile selection.

The conformance unit goes into the Category of the UANodeset for processing in tooling.

Additional Information

As agreed in the OPC UA meeting on July 14, 2020, each type table must be extended with a list of conformance units that require the type.

Add rows with one column to the end of the table.
The first row contains the heading "Conformance Units" in bold.
The second and following rows contain the name of the conformance units the type is required for.
This is typically one conformance unit.

Example can be found in the following document:
OPC 10000-8 - UA Specification Part 8 - DataAccess Draft 1.05.06.ExtensionCategory2.docx
posted in:
https://opcfoundation.sharepoint.com/UA/Work/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FUA%2Fwork%2FMeetings%2F2020%2F2020%2D07%2D14%20Weekly%20Telecon&FolderCTID=0x012000FDF01D76A1A64246B261F99AF1ACA00A&View=%7B10076F95%2D9CBF%2D4395%2D8545%2D378F95701D6A%7D

TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

related to 0005731 closedMatthias Damm 10000-014: PubSub Missing relation of types to conformance units and profiles 

Activities

Karl Deiretsbacher

2020-10-30 09:33

administrator   ~0013094

fixed in 1.03.0 Draft 3
--> Added the relevant CU name to the type tables.

Matthias Damm

2020-12-01 14:54

administrator   ~0013323

Discussed in meeting on December 1.
Completed for RC 1.03

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2020-10-30 09:30 Karl Deiretsbacher New Issue
2020-10-30 09:30 Karl Deiretsbacher Status new => assigned
2020-10-30 09:30 Karl Deiretsbacher Assigned To => Karl Deiretsbacher
2020-10-30 09:30 Karl Deiretsbacher Issue generated from: 0005731
2020-10-30 09:30 Karl Deiretsbacher Relationship added related to 0005731
2020-10-30 09:30 Karl Deiretsbacher Project 10000-014: PubSub => 10000-100: Devices
2020-10-30 09:33 Karl Deiretsbacher Status assigned => resolved
2020-10-30 09:33 Karl Deiretsbacher Resolution open => fixed
2020-10-30 09:33 Karl Deiretsbacher Fixed in Version => 1.03
2020-10-30 09:33 Karl Deiretsbacher Note Added: 0013094
2020-12-01 14:54 Matthias Damm Status resolved => closed
2020-12-01 14:54 Matthias Damm Note Added: 0013323