0006496: 4.8.2 There should be a definition of what is considered a security relevant setting for SecurityAdmin role

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0006496	10000-002: Security	Spec	public	2021-02-17 16:35	2024-01-09 17:48

Reporter	Randy Armstrong	Assigned To	Paul Hunkar
Priority	normal	Severity	minor	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	closed	Resolution	fixed
Fixed in Version	1.05.04 RC1

Summary	0006496: 4.8.2 There should be a definition of what is considered a security relevant setting for SecurityAdmin role
Description	Add examples of security settings such as: assigning roles and identity mapping criteria updating certificates or trust lists set permissions on nodes any other setting which the server sees as related to security.
Additional Information	Security settings should be discussed in Part 2.
Tags	BSI

Commit Version
Fix Due Date

Jim Luth 2021-04-06 16:16 administrator ~0014170	From BSI Review

Paul Hunkar 2024-01-03 06:45 developer ~0020561	Added additional discussion on roles (standard role and where permission associated with them can be found - and default uses for them)

Jim Luth 2024-01-09 17:48 administrator ~0020595	Agreed to changes edited in Web Meeting.

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2021-02-17 16:35	Randy Armstrong	New Issue
2021-02-17 16:35	Randy Armstrong	Issue generated from: 0006495
2021-02-17 16:35	Randy Armstrong	Relationship added	related to 0006495
2021-02-17 16:35	Randy Armstrong	Project	10000-003: Address Space => 10000-002: Security
2021-04-06 16:10	Jim Luth	Assigned To	=> Paul Hunkar
2021-04-06 16:10	Jim Luth	Status	new => assigned
2021-04-06 16:16	Jim Luth	Note Added: 0014170
2021-04-06 16:17	Jim Luth	Tag Attached: BSI
2024-01-03 06:45	Paul Hunkar	Status	assigned => resolved
2024-01-03 06:45	Paul Hunkar	Resolution	open => fixed
2024-01-03 06:45	Paul Hunkar	Fixed in Version	=> 1.05.04 RC1
2024-01-03 06:45	Paul Hunkar	Note Added: 0020561
2024-01-09 17:48	Jim Luth	Status	resolved => closed
2024-01-09 17:48	Jim Luth	Note Added: 0020595