0007224: Possible inconsistent definition of JSON Object Definition for a 'NodeId' <-> 'ExpandedNodeId' at 'Id'

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0007224	10000-006: Mappings	Spec	public	2021-09-13 10:36	2021-09-14 16:10

Reporter	SendMatt	Assigned To	Randy Armstrong
Priority	normal	Severity	minor	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	closed	Resolution	fixed

Summary	0007224: Possible inconsistent definition of JSON Object Definition for a 'NodeId' <-> 'ExpandedNodeId' at 'Id'
Description	Please see https://reference.opcfoundation.org/Core/docs/Part6/5.4.2/ chapter 5.4.2.10 NodeId --> Table 23 – JSON Object Definition for a NodeId: "... Id The Identifier. The value of the [!!!] id field [!!!] specifies the encoding of this field. ..." chapter 5.4.2.11 ExpandedNodeId --> Table 24 – JSON Object Definition for an ExpandedNodeId: "... Id The Identifier. The value of the [!!!] ‘t’ field [!!!] specifies the encoding of this field. ..." I am not common to "JSON" but somehow it looks like an inconsistent definiton (marked above with "[!!!]") of "id" field; I would assume that also at '5.4.2.10 NodeId' the definition " ‘t’ field" [JSON data type syntax ?? ] instead of "id field" is correct. Please check if my assumption is correct or not. Thanks.
Tags	No tags attached.

Commit Version
Fix Due Date

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2021-09-13 10:36	SendMatt	New Issue
2021-09-14 04:35	Randy Armstrong	Assigned To	=> Randy Armstrong
2021-09-14 04:35	Randy Armstrong	Status	new => resolved
2021-09-14 04:35	Randy Armstrong	Resolution	open => fixed
2021-09-14 04:35	Randy Armstrong	Note Added: 0014838
2021-09-14 16:10	Jim Luth	Status	resolved => closed
2021-09-14 16:10	Jim Luth	Fixed in Version	=> 1.05
2021-09-14 16:10	Jim Luth	Note Added: 0014853

Randy Armstrong 2021-09-14 04:35 administrator ~0014838	Typos fixed in text, Now says The value of the IdType field specifies the encoding of this field. in DRAFT 5.

Jim Luth 2021-09-14 16:10 administrator ~0014853	Agreed to changes in 1.05.1 Draft 5.