View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0007268 | 10000-005: Information Model | Spec | public | 2021-09-20 17:54 | 2021-09-23 08:15 |
Reporter | Jeff Harding | Assigned To | Jeff Harding | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 1.05.00 RC1 | ||||
Target Version | 1.05.00 | Fixed in Version | 1.05.00 | ||
Summary | 0007268: SessionSecurityDiagnosticType when roles are not supported by a server | ||||
Description | During 1.05 RC review Wolfgang questions the SessionSecurityDiagnosticType, statement: With the following comment: "Support of the roles is an optional feature. Does that mean, that all old servers providing access to this without supporting roles are broken, and new servers without the roles shall not allow access to the information to anybody? I think this needs to go back to the old text, maybe mentioning the SecurityAdmin role as example." | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | |||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
|
I don't see the need to change or add text to the definition. The sentence states 'should' not 'shall' and therefore does not require a server that does not support roles to comply. |
|
Changed the statement to the following: |
|
Agreed to changes in virtual F2F. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-20 17:54 | Jeff Harding | New Issue | |
2021-09-20 17:56 | Jeff Harding | Note Added: 0014884 | |
2021-09-22 18:10 | Jeff Harding | Assigned To | => Jeff Harding |
2021-09-22 18:10 | Jeff Harding | Status | new => assigned |
2021-09-22 18:11 | Jeff Harding | Status | assigned => resolved |
2021-09-22 18:11 | Jeff Harding | Resolution | open => fixed |
2021-09-22 18:11 | Jeff Harding | Fixed in Version | => 1.05.00 |
2021-09-22 18:11 | Jeff Harding | Note Added: 0014929 | |
2021-09-22 20:40 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2021-09-22 20:40 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0014935 |