View Issue Details
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0007478 | 10000-007: Profiles | Spec | public | 2021-12-17 12:11 | 2023-03-23 16:38 |
| Reporter | Hock, Christian | Assigned To | Paul Hunkar | ||
| Priority | immediate | Severity | block | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
| Product Version | 1.04 | ||||
| Summary | 0007478: Standard DataChange Subscription 2017 Server Facet | ||||
| Description | The "Standard DataChange Subscription 2017 Server Facet" defines in Table 39 the optional method 'ResendData' as mandatory. Would it not be better to make it in this profile optional? Background:
Means for us no serious need to support it as mandatory. | ||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Commit Version | |||||
| Fix Due Date | |||||
|
|
Also the description in V1.05 Part 4 is not clear for us.
The Server Object provides a Method ResendData that initiates resending of all data monitored items in a Subscription. This Method is defined in OPC 10000-5. If this Method is called, subsequent Publish responses shall contain the current values of all data MonitoredItems in the Subscription where the MonitoringMode is set to Reporting. If a value is queued for a data MonitoredItem, the next value in the queue is sent in the Publish response. If no value is queued for a data MonitoredItem, the last value sent is repeated in the Publish response. The Server shall verify that the Method is called within the Session context of the Session that owns the Subscription. |
|
|
ResendData is mandatory by design in this Profile. The test for it was recently added and some Servers have passed 1.04 certification without support for this method. This is wrong and in future CTT tests that are knowingly incomplete will not be released. Paul will email vendors that have already passed 1.04 with this flaw and toolkit vendors to warn them of this new test. Christian will meet with Paul and Alexander to review the timeline of the test lab registration for his product to see if it can be tested with the older CTT version. |
|
|
Paul needs to send email as per above. |
|
|
All vendors have been informed. Agreed to close in Dallas meeting. |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-17 12:11 | Hock, Christian | New Issue | |
| 2021-12-17 12:18 | Hock, Christian | Description Updated | |
| 2021-12-17 12:28 | Hock, Christian | Description Updated | |
| 2021-12-21 16:15 | Hock, Christian | Note Added: 0015595 | |
| 2021-12-21 16:16 | Hock, Christian | Note Edited: 0015595 | |
| 2021-12-21 19:36 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0015607 | |
| 2022-02-08 18:14 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0015955 | |
| 2022-02-08 18:15 | Jim Luth | Assigned To | => Paul Hunkar |
| 2022-02-08 18:15 | Jim Luth | Status | new => assigned |
| 2023-03-23 16:38 | Jim Luth | Status | assigned => closed |
| 2023-03-23 16:38 | Jim Luth | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2023-03-23 16:38 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0019002 |