0007895: typo in <root>/issuer : should be <root>/issuers (with S) to follow defacto

ID	Project	Category	View Status	Date Submitted	Last Update

0007895	10000-012: Discovery	Spec	public	2022-03-26 11:27	2022-07-05 16:57

Reporter	Etienne Rossignon	Assigned To	Jim Luth
Priority	high	Severity	major	Reproducibility	have not tried
Status	closed	Resolution	no change required
Product Version	1.05.00 RC1

Summary	0007895: typo in <root>/issuer : should be <root>/issuers (with S) to follow defacto
Description	In annex F: F.1 Certificate Store Directory Layout (https://reference.opcfoundation.org/GDS/docs/F.1/) <root>/issuer The Certificate store which contains the CA Certificates needed for validation. <root>/issuer/certs Contains the X.509 v3 Certificates which are needed for validation. <root>/issuer/crl Contains the X.509 v3 CRLs for any Certificates in the ./certs directory. However looking at CTT test tools and other SDK such as UnifiedAutomation , and UAExpert , or even Prosys Demo Server, It seems that <root>/issuers ( with a S ) is widely use . This typo has been originally reported by a node-opcua users that also use the <root>/issuers convention. https://github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua-pki/issues/26 I wonder if <root>/issuer should be renamed <root>/issuers in the documentation or if everybody should conform to the <root>/issuer folder normative convention ?
Tags	No tags attached.

Commit Version
Fix Due Date

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2022-03-26 11:27	Etienne Rossignon	New Issue
2022-07-05 16:57	Jim Luth	Assigned To	=> Jim Luth
2022-07-05 16:57	Jim Luth	Status	new => closed
2022-07-05 16:57	Jim Luth	Resolution	open => no change required
2022-07-05 16:57	Jim Luth	Note Added: 0017091

Jim Luth 2022-07-05 16:57 administrator ~0017091	The spec currently matches the implementation of the LDS for which this path is normative. For all other implementations the path is a non-normative recommendation.