View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0008609 | 30120: IO-Link | Documentation Errata | public | 2023-01-13 10:30 | 2023-06-02 11:56 |
Reporter | Martin Lang | Assigned To | |||
Priority | high | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||
Target Version | V1.01 | ||||
Summary | 0008609: ApplicationSpecific-/Function-/LocationTag Information for Pin2 and Pin4 | ||||
Description | Only the IOLinkDeviceType defines these tags. If Port is configured to e.g. DI not tags available anymore. Do we need ApplicationSpec.-/Function-/LocationTag for Pin2 and optinally for Pin4? | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
related to | 0007416 | confirmed | Deepak Yadav | Support for IO Link Wireless Extensions |
|
J.S. Yes, might be good for the case that one wants to name his analog devices. @Editor: Please double check the clarification is in V1.00.01 and V1.01 document. |
|
WG decision: No extension from our companion specification. If this would be a use case this should be defined by the SMI from IO-Link. |
|
See last comment. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-13 10:30 | Martin Lang | New Issue | |
2023-01-13 10:44 | Martin Lang | Summary | ApplicationSpecific-/Function-/LocationTag Information without IO-Link => ApplicationSpecific-/Function-/LocationTag Information for Pin2 and Pin4 |
2023-01-13 10:44 | Martin Lang | Description Updated | |
2023-01-13 10:44 | Martin Lang | Note Added: 0018478 | |
2023-01-13 14:37 | Martin Lang | Priority | normal => high |
2023-02-10 17:01 | Martin Lang | Relationship added | related to 0007416 |
2023-02-10 18:36 | Martin Lang | Target Version | => V1.01 |
2023-06-02 11:55 | Martin Lang | Note Added: 0019455 | |
2023-06-02 11:56 | Martin Lang | Status | new => resolved |
2023-06-02 11:56 | Martin Lang | Resolution | open => no change required |
2023-06-02 11:56 | Martin Lang | Note Added: 0019456 |