View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0009091Part 81: UAFX Connecting Devices and Information ModelSpecpublic2024-07-10 19:28
ReporterGeorg Biehler Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityhave not tried
Status acknowledgedResolutionreopened 
Target VersionCtoDFixed in Version1.00.02 
Summary0009091: Fast detection of changes to the ConnectionManager
Description

Since multiple ConnectionEditor may change the CM's database in parallel, there should be a fast detection for the "LastChangeDate" of the database to avoid reading the complete database. By that a ConnectionEditor can avoid reading the complete database.

TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

related to 0008789 closedGeorg Biehler Need standard file format for persistence of CCS 

Activities

Georg Biehler

2023-08-11 14:28

developer   ~0019865

Added the LastUpdate to the ConnectionManagerType and behaviour in EditCCS and CloseAndUpdate.

Paul Hunkar

2023-08-15 13:45

manager   ~0019872

reviewed changes, agreed to changes and closed issue

Georg Biehler

2023-08-24 14:16

developer   ~0019918

Discussion in team showed that the concept does not hold. Rework is needed.

Georg Biehler

2023-08-24 14:44

developer   ~0019919

Updated with Version on the CCS.
Need discussion whether we still need the LastUpdate on the CM ... probably not.

Paul Hunkar

2023-08-30 13:38

manager   ~0019927

decided in call to push this to next release - needs input from C2D requirements as well

Georg Biehler

2023-08-31 12:53

developer   ~0019932

From the comment to that addtion:
(Paul Hunkar):
What I would have liked was a simple rollup status, that indicates if any of the CCS have an error in their statemachine ( - in the future we can work on more elaborate information
Each CCS has athe statemachine and this would be a simple roll-up that there is an error in one of them (you would have tolook at all of them to figure out which one and any more details)

(Georg Biehler):
Good proposal; I remember that we discussed in the slde set regarding diagnostics an aggregated health for the CM, however, can’t recall, why we did not add that??? Did we forget that or did we have other reasons?

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2023-08-11 09:46 Georg Biehler New Issue
2023-08-11 09:47 Georg Biehler Relationship added related to 0008789
2023-08-11 14:14 Georg Biehler Assigned To => Georg Biehler
2023-08-11 14:14 Georg Biehler Status new => assigned
2023-08-11 14:28 Georg Biehler Status assigned => resolved
2023-08-11 14:28 Georg Biehler Resolution open => fixed
2023-08-11 14:28 Georg Biehler Fixed in Version => 1.00.02
2023-08-11 14:28 Georg Biehler Note Added: 0019865
2023-08-15 13:45 Paul Hunkar Status resolved => closed
2023-08-15 13:45 Paul Hunkar Note Added: 0019872
2023-08-15 13:51 Paul Hunkar Relationship added related to 0009050
2023-08-15 13:51 Paul Hunkar Relationship deleted related to 0009050
2023-08-24 14:16 Georg Biehler Status closed => feedback
2023-08-24 14:16 Georg Biehler Resolution fixed => reopened
2023-08-24 14:16 Georg Biehler Note Added: 0019918
2023-08-24 14:44 Georg Biehler Status feedback => resolved
2023-08-24 14:44 Georg Biehler Note Added: 0019919
2023-08-30 13:38 Paul Hunkar Status resolved => feedback
2023-08-30 13:38 Paul Hunkar Note Added: 0019927
2023-08-30 13:38 Paul Hunkar Status feedback => acknowledged
2023-08-30 13:38 Paul Hunkar Assigned To Georg Biehler =>
2023-08-31 12:53 Georg Biehler Note Added: 0019932
2024-07-10 19:28 Paul Hunkar Target Version => CtoD