View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0009119 | 10000-014: PubSub | Spec | public | 2023-08-22 11:54 | 2024-03-20 21:20 |
Reporter | Thomas Merk | Assigned To | Matthias Damm | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 1.05.02 | ||||
Fixed in Version | 1.05.04 RC1 | ||||
Summary | 0009119: Unclear consequence of omitted data set header | ||||
Description | Table 92 - JsonNetworkMessageContentMask What is exactly meant by "ignored"? All bits in DataSetMessageContentMask - except "ReversibleFieldEncoding" - are related to data in the dataset message "header". If a false at DataSetMessageHeader in NetworkMessageContentMask shall also cause ignoring the "ReversibleFieldEncoding", then it should be clearly stated. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Commit Version | 1.05.04 RC | ||||
Fix Due Date | |||||
|
Updated description to: |
|
Agreed to changes edited in Dallas F2F. |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-22 11:54 | Thomas Merk | New Issue | |
2023-12-04 17:59 | Matthias Damm | Assigned To | => Matthias Damm |
2023-12-04 17:59 | Matthias Damm | Status | new => resolved |
2023-12-04 17:59 | Matthias Damm | Resolution | open => fixed |
2023-12-04 17:59 | Matthias Damm | Note Added: 0020469 | |
2024-03-20 21:20 | Jim Luth | Status | resolved => closed |
2024-03-20 21:20 | Jim Luth | Fixed in Version | => 1.05.04 RC1 |
2024-03-20 21:20 | Jim Luth | Commit Version | => 1.05.04 RC |
2024-03-20 21:20 | Jim Luth | Note Added: 0020984 |